=
a
|
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2450
HD
Docket No. NR8&480-14
2OLE
9 Bonsai
ee re eee
To: Secretary of the Navy
» i
REVIEW OF NAV.
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 10 Jul 14 w/attachments |
(2) Copy of Subject’s fitrep for 3 to 8 Mar 13
(3) HQMC e-mail dtd 2 Dec 14
(4) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 2 Feb 15
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by modifying his data in the Marine Corps Total Force System
(MCTPS) to remove the entry "58L Detachment Commander IH [incomplete
other than academic failure, will be recycled through same course
no additional training will be required] .”
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. PO
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
19 February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. Enclosure (2) is Petitioner's fitness report for 3 to 8 March
2013, whose removal has been directed by the Headquarters Marine
Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB). This
fitness report documented Petitioner's disenrollment from the Marine
Security Guard Detachment Commander Class 3-13.
c. Enclosure (3) reflects the basis for the PERB action.
ad. Inenclosure (4), the HQOMC office with cognizance over the
subject matter of Petitioner’s case has commented to the effect the
request has merit and warrant favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (4), the Board finds the existence
of an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing,
from his data in MCTFS, the entry °58L Detachment Commander IH.”
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.
4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
JONATHAN S. RUSKIN:
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
ive action taken under the authority of reference
foregoing correct
mn behalf of the Secretary of
(a), has been approved by the Board o
the Navy.
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07
He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3524 13
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. In enclosure (8), MIQ commented to the effect that in light of enclosure (7), the contested BCP assignment and page 11 entries should be removed. of enclosures (5) and (8), the Board finds the existence of an error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02280 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2009, a copy of which is at Tab A. That his record be corrected further to restore his AMOS of 8411. c. That his record be corrected further to show his entitlement to SDA pay for 21 July 2010 to 13 June...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10691 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference:(a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with “his Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 January to 31 duly 2007 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ivins and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00378-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (5), the HOMC office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s implied request to remove her failure of selection for promotion commented to the effect that this request should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00700-09
The Board, consisting of Ms. Colbert and Messrs. Storz and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HOMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to remove the service record page llb entry has commented to the effect that this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11
The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1415 13
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Spain and Vogt, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error ana injustice on 15 May 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{(e)) and having assured compliance with...